Invasion History
First Non-native North American Tidal Record: 1999First Non-native West Coast Tidal Record: 1999
First Non-native East/Gulf Coast Tidal Record:
General Invasion History:
Fredericella indica is a freshwater bryozoan first described from India. It is widespread in North America, Europe, and Asia (Wood and Backus 1992; Ricciardi and Reiswig 1994). In North America, it is known from Nova Scotia, and the Great Lakes Basin from Ontario (Rogick 1935, Ricciardi and Reiswig 1994), south to Louisiana (Everitt 1975).
North American Invasion History:
Invasion History on the West Coast:
Fredericella indica is rare and scattered in western North America. Marsh and Wood (2002) found it at four locations in Washington and Oregon, all in mountain sites. It has also been found in lakes and rivers in Montana, Idaho, and Vancouver Island, British Columbia (Okamura and Wood 2002). It is apparently introduced to the Columbia River estuary (Sytsma et al. 2004). It was first reported there in 1999, and was described as 'widespread in the lower bays of the basin (in brackish as well as freshwater) (Sytsma et al. 2004). One location, Ilwaco Harbor, had salinities of 4-10 PSU (Sytsma et al. 2004; USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Program 2011). Likely vectors include fish-stocking, trailered boats, fishing gear, and ornamental aquatic plants. As with other freshwater bryozoans, its statoblasts are tolerant of desiccation. Fredericella sp. is abundant in low-salinity parts of the San Francisco estuary (Jimenez et al. 2018), but has not been identified to species.
Invasion History on the East Coast:
Fredericella indica is known from Nova Scotia, and the Great Lakes Basin from Ontario (Rogick 1935, Ricciardi and Reiswig 1994), south to Louisiana (Everitt 1975).
Description
Fredericella indica is a freshwater bryozoan, which can form either prostrate or erect branches. The prostrate branches have a keel, but the erect branches lack a keel and are antler-shaped. The external cuticle (ectocyst) is brown or grey, and lightly or heavily encrusted. The lophophore, when extended, is circular in outline. Like other freshwater bryozoans, it produces statoblasts, masses of cells, covered with a resistant covering of chitin, which develop on the funiculus, at the base of the zooid. These are asexually produced propagules which can survive desiccation, cold, and other adverse conditions. Statoblasts of F. indica are kidney or bean-shaped, and covered extensively with small hexagonal pits. They lack an annulus and are not buoyant (Description from Ricciardi and Reiswig 1994).
Fredericella indica from North America is morphologically very similar to European specimens of F. sultana, differing only in the extensive pitting of the statoblasts in F. indica, and in chromosome numbers (Wood and Backus 1992).
Taxonomy
Taxonomic Tree
Kingdom: | Animalia | |
Phylum: | Bryozoa | |
Class: | Phylactolaemata | |
Order: | Plumatellida | |
Family: | Fredericellidae | |
Genus: | Fredericella | |
Species: | indica |
Synonyms
Tubularia sultana (Blumenbach, 1779)
Potentially Misidentified Species
Reports of this species from North America refer to F. indica (Wood and Backus 1992)
Ecology
General:
Life History- Fredericella indica is a bush-like, soft-bodied, freshwater bryozoan composed of many individual zooids. The zooids feed by extending the ciliated tentacles of the lophophore as a funnel, creating a current, and driving food particles into their mouths. The food is guided by cilia down the tentacles and through the pharynx. Larger food particles can be moved or captured by flicking or contracting the tentacles. The zooids are hermaphroditic, and produce large eggs, which are released into an embryo sac in the body cavity. This develops into a ciliated cystid sac, which buds off several zooids. The sac is a small ciliated colony which swims for a short period (less than 1-2 days). The cystid sac settles and the ciliated outer wall degenerates. The new colony continues to grow, but the parent zooids die, so that only the tips of the colony contain living zooids. Colonies also produce asexual propagules, called statoblasts, masses of cells enclosed by a chitinous shell. Statoblasts remain dormant and are resistant to desiccation and freezing and they have great potential for dispersal (Barnes 1983). In F. indica, statoblasts are not buoyant (Ricciardi and Reiswig 1994). While colonies of other freshwater bryozoans die off in winter, F. indica is unusual in surviving under ice (Wood 1991).
Ecology- Fredericella indica inhabits lakes and rivers, in oligotrophic to eutrophic conditions, at 4.7-9.4 pH and 4-32 ⁰C (Everitt 1975; Ricciardi and Reiswig 1994). It has been found attached to rocks, wood, aquatic vegetation, sponges, freshwater mussels, and other bryozoans (Wood 1991). It is a freshwater species but has been collected at salinities as high as 10 PSU in Ilwaco Harbor, Columbia River estuary (Sytsma et al. 2004; USGS Nonindigenous Species Program 2011).
Food:
Phytoplankton, detritus
Trophic Status:
Suspension Feeder
SusFedHabitats
General Habitat | Nontidal Freshwater | None |
General Habitat | Fresh (nontidal) Marsh | None |
General Habitat | Grass Bed | None |
General Habitat | Coarse Woody Debris | None |
Salinity Range | Limnetic | 0-0.5 PSU |
Salinity Range | Oligohaline | 0.5-5 PSU |
Tidal Range | Subtidal | None |
Vertical Habitat | Epibenthic | None |
Tolerances and Life History Parameters
Minimum Salinity (‰) | 0 | This is a freshwater species. |
Maximum Salinity (‰) | 10 | Field salinity, Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, Columbia River (Systsma et al. 2005). |
Broad Temperature Range | None | Cold temperate-Tropical |
Broad Salinity Range | None | Nontidal Limnetic-Oligohaline |
General Impacts
There are no reported impacts of Fredericella indica in the Columbia River estuary, the only estuary in which it has been found to be introduced. However, F. indica is one of several freshwater bryozoans that can be a host of the early life-cycle stages of Tetracapsula bryosalmonae, a myxozoan which causes proliferative kidney disease (PKD) in salmonids. It has been found in locations upstream from streams and lakes where outbreaks have occurred (Okamura and Wood 2002).Regional Distribution Map
Bioregion | Region Name | Year | Invasion Status | Population Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
P260 | Columbia River | 1999 | Non-native | Established |
M130 | Chesapeake Bay | 0 | Native | Established |
GL-II | Lake Erie | 0 | Native | Established |
GL-I | Lakes Huron, Superior and Michigan | 0 | Native | Established |
L095 | _CDA_L095 (Cedar-Portage) | 0 | Native | Established |
G170 | West Mississippi Sound | 0 | Native | Established |
L123 | _CDA_L123 (St. Lawrence River) | 0 | Native | Established |
L103 | _CDA_L103 (Chautauqua-Connaut) | 0 | Native | Established |
P090 | San Francisco Bay | 2017 | Non-native | Established |
NEP-IV | Puget Sound to Northern California | 1999 | Non-native | Established |
NA-ET3 | Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras | 0 | Native | Established |
CAR-I | Northern Yucatan, Gulf of Mexico, Florida Straits, to Middle Eastern Florida | 0 | Native | Established |
NEP-V | Northern California to Mid Channel Islands | 2017 | Non-native | Established |
Occurrence Map
OCC_ID | Author | Year | Date | Locality | Status | Latitude | Longitude |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
767936 | Ruiz et al., 2015 | 2011 | 2011-09-26 | Antioch Marina, San Francisco Bay, CA, California, USA | Non-native | 38.0203 | -121.8211 |
767938 | Ruiz et al., 2015 | 2011 | 2011-09-26 | Pittsburg Marina, San Francisco Bay, CA, California, USA | Non-native | 38.0346 | -121.8829 |
768046 | Ruiz et al., 2015 | 2012 | 2012-08-31 | Antioch Marina, San Francisco Bay, CA, California, USA | Non-native | 38.0203 | -121.8211 |
768259 | Ruiz et al., 2015 | 2012 | 2012-09-13 | Port of Stockton, San Francisco Bay, CA, California, USA | Non-native | 37.9589 | -121.3609 |
References
Banta, William C.; Backus, Byron T. (1991) <missing title>, US Department of the Interior, Washington DC. Pp. <missing location>Barnes, Robert D. (1983) Invertebrate Zoology, Saunders, Philadelphia. Pp. 883
Everitt, Betty (1975) Fresh-water Ectoprocta: distribution and ecology of five species in southeastern Louisiana, Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 94(1): 130-134
Jimenez, H.; Keppel, E.; Chang, A. L.; Ruiz, G. M. (2018) Invasions in marine communities: Contrasting species richness and community composition across habitats and salinity, Estuarine and Coasts 41: 484-494
Marsh, Terrence; Wood, Timothy S. (2002) Bryozoan Studies 2001, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse. Pp. <missing location>
Mathieson, Arthur C.; Dawes, Clinton J. (2017) Seaweeds of the Northwest Atlantic, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst MA. Pp. <missing location>
Ricciardi, Anthony; Reiswig, Henry M. (1994) Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the freshwater bryozoans (Ectoprocta) of eastern Canada, Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 339-359
Rogick, Mary D. (1935) Studies on Freshwater Bryozoa: II. The Bryozoa of Lake Erie., Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 54(3): 245-263
Salmon, Terry and 21 authors 2014-2022 California Fish Website. https://calfish.ucdavis.edu/
Sytsma, Mark D.; Cordell, Jeffrey R.; Chapman, John W.; Draheim, Robyn, C. (2004) <missing title>, Center for Lakes and Reservoirs, Portland State University, Portland OR. Pp. <missing location>
USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Program 2003-2024 Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/
Wood, T. S. (2002) Bryozoan Studies 2001, Swets & Zeiltinger, Lisse, Netherlands. Pp. 339-345
Wood, Timothy S. (1989) Ectoproct Bryozoans of Ohio, Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey 8(2): 1-67
Wood, Timothy S. (1991) Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Academic Press, San Diego. Pp. 481-499
Wood, Timothy S. ; Backus, Byron A. (1992) Differentiation of North American and European forms of Fredericella sultana (Blumenbach) (Ectoprocta: Phylactolaemata)., Hydrobiologia 237: 185-193