• ChesReport (current)
  • Marine Invasions Lab
  • Partner Portals
    Nemesis California Panama Galapagos Cocos Island NP JTMD
    Archived Projects
    Chesapeake
  • Browse Species
    Taxonomic Groups All Species
  • News
  • login
You are viewing an archived site. The Chesapeake Bay Introduced Species Database project ended in 2020 and the database is no longer receiving updates. Learn more…
Image of Lepomis gulosus

Lepomis gulosus

Fishes

Warmouth

Image Credit: Iowa DNR

Taxonomy Invasion History Ecology Impacts References

Description


Taxonomy

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Animalia Chordata Osteichthyes Perciformes Centrarchidae Lepomis

Synonyms

Lepomis gilli; Chaenobryttus gulosus; Chaenobryttus coronarius

Invasion History

Chesapeake Bay Status

First Record Population Range Introduction Residency Source Region Native Region Vectors
1895 Established Stable Introduced Regular Resident North America North America Fisheries(Fisheries Intentional)

History of Spread

Lepomis gulosus (Warmouth) is native to the Great Lakes and Missisippi Basins, PA to MN, south to the Gulf, and Atlantic drainages south of the James River (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1980; Page and Burr 1991). The original range on the Atlantic Coastal Plain is uncertain because of extensive introductions and uncertain early records. It was considered probably native to James and Dismal Swamp, based on Cope's (1869) record, but could have been introduced much earlier. It is probably introduced elsewhere, including the York and Rappahannock, with some uncertainty due to the lack of early records and spotty present distribution, but clearly introduced in the Potomac (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993).

Lepmomis gulosus was frequently stocked by the United States Fish Commission (USFC) and state fish commissions, starting in 1894 . Shipments and stocking by United States Fish Commission occurred mostly within the species' range but also to WA, CA, and MA (Bean 1896; Ravenel 1898). Currently, it has been introduced to 20 states and Puerto Rico (Hardy 1978; Florida Caribbean Science Center 2001). Stocking has been continued by many state agencies to the present. It is introduced in the Hudson River, the Columbia River, and the San Francisco Bay Delta (Cohen and Carlton 1995; Fuller et al. 1999; Mills et al. 1997).

Chesapeake Bay records are summarized below:

James River - Lepomis gulosus was first collected in the James drainage in Tuckahoe Creek near Richmond (Cope 1869). There are few or no further records until after 1950 (Raney 1950). It was stocked in middle James by United States Fish Commission in 1901 (Ravenel 1902). More recently, it was rare in the Chickahominy estuary, a James tributary (McIvor and Odum 1988).

York River - The first verified record of L. gulosus was in 1934 (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993), but it was not reported from the tidal Pamunkey in 1949 (Raney and Massmann 1953).

Rappahannock River - The first verified record of L. gulosus was in1938 (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993), but it was not reported from the tidal river by 1951(Massman et al. 1952). It was found there by Maurakis et al. (1987).

Potomac River - Lepomis gulosus was stocked in Shenandoah River, 1893 (Worth 1895), and was first caught in the Washington DC area, in Little River, in 1897. By 1898 it was 'apparently becoming common in a few places' (Smith and Bean 1898). It was collected at Chain Bridge in 1910 (U.S. National Museum of Natural History 2001). It was abundant in the Piedmont in the C&O canal at Seneca Creek, Montgomery County MD (Radcliffe and Welsh 1916). L. gulosus was not listed for the Potomac Estuary by Lippson and Moran (1974) and not collected in tidal fresh water by Killgore et al. (1989) or Serafy et al. (1994). However, it was found in nontidal ponds and streams at Fort Belvoir VA, near Gunston Cove (Ernst et al. 1995).

Patuxent River - Lepomis gulosus was stocked near Laurel MD by United States Fish Commission in 1893-94, and was locally common in upland impoundments (Mansueti 1950). It was not recorded from the estuary (Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary 1995; Mansueti 1950).

Susquehanna River - Lepomis gulosus was reported as apparently introduced to the river (Fowler 1919), but was not listed for the river by Denoncourt and Cooper (1975) or Denoncourt et al. (1975b), or for the river below Conowingo Dam by McKeown (1984).

Upper Bay - Lepomis gulosus was reported as occurring in ponds in Cecil County, MD (Raasch and Altemus 1991). A specimen was caught in Broad Creek, a South River tributary near Annapolis in October, 2008 (Rob Aguilar, personal communication).

Eastern Shore Tributaries - Lepomis gulosus was present locally in the drainage by 1976 (Lee et al. 1976).

Delaware River - Lepomis gulosus was introduced in the Delaware River (Fowler 1948), and was present, but rare in the estuary (Horwitz 1986). A population was discovered in Augustine Creek, New Castle County, in 1996 (Raasch 1996).

History References - Bean 1896; Cope 1869; Denoncourt and Cooper 1975; Denoncourt et al. 1975b; Ernst et al. 1995; Florida Caribbean Science Center 2000; Fowler 1919; Fowler 1948; Hardy 1978; Horwitz 1986; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Killgore et al. 1989; Lee et al. 1976; Lippson and Moran 1974; Mansueti 1950; Massmann et al. 1952; Maurakis et al. 1987; McKeown 1984; McIvor and Odum 1988; Raasch and Altemus 1991; Radcliffe and Welsh 1916; Raney 1950; Raney and Massmann 1953; Ravenel 1902; Serafy et al. 1994; Smith and Bean 1898; U.S. National Museum of Natural History 2001; Worth 1895

Invasion Comments

Ecology

Environmental Tolerances

For SurvivalFor Reproduction
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Temperature (ºC) 34.0 21.1
Salinity (‰) 0.0 17.4 0.0 0.0
Oxygen hypoxic
pH
Salinity Range fresh-meso

Age and Growth

Male Female
Minimum Adult Size (mm) 75.0 75.0
Typical Adult Size (mm) 130.0 130.0
Maximum Adult Size (mm) 284.0 284.0
Maximum Longevity (yrs) 8.0 11.0
Typical Longevity (yrs 4.0 5.0

Reproduction

Start Peak End
Reproductive Season
Typical Number of Young
Per Reproductive Event
Sexuality Mode(s)
Mode(s) of Asexual
Reproduction
Fertilization Type(s)
More than One Reproduction
Event per Year
Reproductive Startegy
Egg/Seed Form

Impacts

Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay

Economic impacts of Lepomis gulosus' (Warmouth's) introduction are probably limited by low abundance in tidal waters.

Fisheries - Lepomis gulosus (Warmouth) is a good sport fish, but limited in distribution and only locally common (Musick 1972a; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993), so impacts in the Bay and watershed are likely to be small.

References - Musick 1972a; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993


Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay

Lepomis gulosus (Warmouth) is a popular sportfish, but has had only limited introductions in the Atlantic drainage (Lee et al. 1980). It has been introduced to drainages in 14 U.S. states (Fuller et al. 1999).

References- Fuller et al. 1999; Lee et al. 1980


Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species

Effects of Lepomis gulosus' (Warmouth's) introduction on abundance of native centrarchid populations in Chesapeake Bay are not known. Impacts are probably limited by low abundance in tidal waters.

Hybridization - Lepomis gulosus hybridizes with L. gibbosus in VA (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993).

Competition - Lepomis gulosus has a larger mouth and is more piscivorous than Lepomis auritis and L. gibbosus (Carlander 1977; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). In Tuckahoe Creek (lower Piedmont; VA); it fed more heavily on crayfish and less heavily on insect larvae than L. auritis, L. gibbosus, and Enneacanthus gloriosus (Flemer and Woolcott 1966). In Cedar Lake; IL, its diet overlapped considerably with those of Perca flavescens and L. gibbosus (Savitz 1981).

Reerencefs - Carlander 1977; Flemer and Woolcott 1966; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Savitz 1981


Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species

Impacts of Lepomis gulosus (Warmouth) are limited by its low abundance in tidal waters (Musick 1972a).

Hybridization - Lepomis gulosus hybridizes with Lepomis cyanellus (Green Sunfish), L. macrochirus (Bluegill), and L. microlophus (Redear Sunfish) (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993).

Competition - Some food overlap with other introduced Lepomis spp. is likely. However; L. gulosus has a larger mouth and can take larger prey as adults than L. macrochirus. In Tuckahoe Creek, (lower Piedmont, VA) L. gulosus fed more heavily on decapods and less on insect larvae and copepods than L. macrochirus (Flemer and Woolcott 1966). In Lake Ponchartrain LA, L. gulosus fed heavily on Paleomonetes sp. (Grass Shrimp), which were not eaten by L. microlophus or L. macrochirus (Desselles et al. 1978).

Lepomis microlophus and L. megalotis feed more frequently on molluscs (Carlander 1977; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; McCrady 1990). In an IL pond with high densities of L. macrochirus, L. gulosus did not become stunted but never constituted more than 5% of the population (Carlander 1977). Lepomis cyanellus resembles L. gulosus in having a relatively large mouth for the genus, but L. cyanellus is mostly restricted to tidal fresh parts of the upper Bay, while L. gulosus is most abundant in tidal fresh tributaries of the lower Bay (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Musick 1972 ).

Food/Prey- Lepomis gulosus is a likely prey of Micropterus salmoides (Largemouth Bass) and other large predatory fishes (Carlander 1977).

References - Carlander 1977; Desselles et al. 1978; Flemer and Woolcott 1966; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; McCrady 1990; Musick 1972a


References

Bean, Tarleton H. (1896) Report on the propagation and distribution of food-fishes, In: (Eds.) Report of the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries for 1894. , Washington, D.C.. Pp.

Carlander, Kenneth D. (1977) Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology. , In: (Eds.) Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology, Volume Two: Life History Data on Centrarchid Fishes of the U.S & Canada. , Ames. Pp. Ames

Carmichael, John, Richardson, Brian, Jordan, Steve (1992) Development and testing of measures of ecological integrity and habitat quality for Chesapeake Bay tidal tributaries, , Annapolis MD. Pp.

Cope, Edward Drinker (1869) On the distribution of fishes in the Allegheny region of southwestern Virginia, Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 6: 207-249

Denoncourt, Robert F.; Robbins, Timothy W.; Hesser, Robert (1975) Recent introductions and reintroductions to the Pennsylvania fish fauna of the Susquehanna River drainage above Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 49: 57-58

Denoncourt, Robert F.; Cooper, Edwin L. (1975) A review of the literature and checklist of fishes of the Susquehanna River drainage above Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 49: 121-125

Desselles, Wayne J.; Poirrier, Michael A.; Rogers, James S.; Cashner, Robert C. (1978) A discriminant functions analysis of sunfish (Lepomis) food habits and feeding niche segregation in the Lake Ponchartrain, Louisiana estuary, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 107: 713-719

Elser, Harold J. (1960) Creel results on the Northeast River, Maryland, 1958, Chesapeake Science 1: 41-47

Ernst, Carl H.; Wilgenbusch, James C.,; Morgan, Donald L.; Boucher, Timothy P.; Sommerfield, Mark (1995) Fishes of Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Maryland Naturalist 39: 1-60

1966 Food habits and distribution of the fishes of Tuckahoe Creek, Virginia, with special emphasis on the bluegill, <i>Lepomis macrochirus</i> Rafinesque.

1996 Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/

Fowler, Henry W. (1919) A list of the fishes of Pennsylvania, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 32: 49-74

Fowler, Henry W. (1948) A list of the fishes of Pennsylvania., Bulletin of the Board of Fish Commisioners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 7: 1-26

Fuller, Pam. L.; Nico, Leo; Williams, J. D. (1999) Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States, , Bethesda MD. Pp.

Hardy, Jerry D., Jr. (1978) Development of fishes of the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Vol. 3. Aphredoderidae through Rachycentridae., In: (Eds.) . , Washington DC. Pp.

Horwitz, Richard J. (1986) Fishes of the Delaware estuary in Pennsylvania., In: Majundar, S.K., Brenner, F. J., Rhoads, A. F.(Eds.) Endangered and Threatened Species Programs in Pennsylvania.. , Philadelphia. Pp. 177-201

Jenkins, Robert E.; Burkhead, Noel M. (1993) Freshwater fishes of Virginia., , Bethesda, MD. Pp.

Killgore, K. Jack; Morgan, Raymond P. II; Rybicki, Nancy B. (1989) Distribution and abundance of fishes associated with submersed aquatic plants in the Potomac River, North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9: 101-111

Lee, David S. (1976) Aquatic zoogeography of Maryland, Atlantic Naturalist 31: 147-158

Lee, David S.; Gilbert, Carter R.; Hocutt, Charles H.; Jenkins, Robert E.; McAllister, Don E.; Stauffer, Jay R. (1980) Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, , Raleigh. Pp.

Lee, David S.; Platania, S. P.; Gilbert, Carter R.; Franz, Richard; Norden, Arnold (1981) A revised list of the freshwater fishes of Maryland and Delaware, Proceedings of the Southeastern Fishes Council 3: 1-9

Lippson, Alice J.; Moran, R. Lynn (1974) Manual for identification of early developmental stages of fishes of the Potomac River estuary., In: (Eds.) . , Baltimore MD. Pp.

Mansueti, Romeo J. (1964) Eggs, larvae, and young of the white perch, Roccus americanus, with comments on its ecology in the Estuary, Chesapeake Science 5: 3-45

Massmann, William H.; Ladd, Ernest C.; McCutcheon, Henry M. (1952) A biological survey of the Rappahannock River, Virginia, Virginia Fisheries Laboratory Special Scientific Report 6: 1-152

Maurakis, Eugene; Woolcott, William S.; Jenkins, Robert E. (1987) Physiographic analyses of the longitudinal distribution of fishes in the Rappahannock River, Virginia, ASB Bulletin 34: 1-14

McCrady, Ellen Joy (1990) Interactions between the invasive freshwater clam, Corbicula fluminea, and its fish predators in Lake Fairfield, Texas, , Arlington, Texas. Pp.

McIvor, Carole C.; Odum, William E. (1988) Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage, Ecology 69: 1341-1351

Murdy, Edward O.; Birdsong, Ray S.; Musick, John A. (1997) Fishes of Chesapeake Bay, , Washington, D.C.. Pp. 57-289

Musick, J. A.; Wiley, Martin L. (1972) Fishes of Chesapeake Bay and the adjacent coastal plain, Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 65: 175-212

Page, Lawrence M.; Burr, Brooks M. (1991) Freshwater Fishes., , Boston. Pp.

Peterson, Mark S. (1988) Comparative physiological ecology of centrarchids in hyposaline environments, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 827-833

Raasch, Maynard S.; Altemus, Vaughn L., Sr. (1991) Delaware's freshwater and brackish water fishes: a popular account, , Wilmingotn, Delaware. Pp.

Radcliffe, Lewis; Welsh, W. W. (1916) A list of the fishes of the Seneca Creek, Montgomery County, Maryland Region, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 29: 39-45

Raney, Edward C. (1950) Freshwater fishes., , Richmond. Pp. 151-194

Raney, Edward, C.; Massmann, William H. (1953) The fishes of the tidewater section of the Pamunkey River, Virginia, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 43: 424-432

Ravenel, William De C. (1902) Report of the United States Commission on Fish and Fisheries for 1900, , Washington, D.C.. Pp.

Savitz, Jan (1981) Trophic diversity and food partioning among fishes associated with aquatic macrophyte patches, Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Sciences 74: 111-120

Serafy, Joseph E.; Harrell, Reginal M.; Hurley, Linda M. (1994) Mechanical removal of Hydrilla in the Potomac River, Maryland: Local impacts on vegetation and associated fishes, Journal of Freshwater Ecology 9: 135-143

Smith, Hugh M.; Bean, Barton A. (1898) List of fishes known to inhabit the waters of the District of Columbia and vicinity., Bulletin of the U. S. Fish Commission 18: 179-187

Worth, S. G. (1895) A review of the history and results of the attempts to acclimatize fish and other water animals in the Pacific states, In: (Eds.) Report of the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries for 1893. , Washington D.C.. Pp. 78-138


Direct questions and comments to chesnemo@si.edu.

©